Professor Harston was on one today!
I just took a test for my Constititutional Rights and Responsibilities test. One question was:
42. The essence of a provision forbidding the acquisition of evidence by the prosecution illegally is that not merely evidence so acquired shall not be used before the Court but that it shall not be used at all...unless knowledge of them is gained from an independent source, free from the original taint of wrongdoing.
a) Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. U.S.
b) Aguilar v. Texas
c) Miller v. U.S.
d) Payton v. New York
e) Spinelli v. U.S.
Whoa, were I less of a man, that wording would make me cry.
Bonus Points to whoever chooses the correct answer.
6 Comments:
I don't know what is more a shock to the system: the wording of your test, or the new post on your old, dusty blog.
I love to hear from you!
You are a man! I only made it halfway through the question before I started crying.
D.
D for duh, what did you just say?
Good thing you are such a good reader from your youth! Note: that is why my Dad and my brother, Bruce were glad they got ENGLISH degrees before lawschool.
What is up with little Ky-Ky?
well well well. i wasn't aware you had a blog! i'm so glad :) and i like the comment about English degrees before law school...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home